Insight, analysis & opinion from Joe Paduda

< Back to Home

Jul
7

Hospitals agree to reduce their costs – sort of

Hospitals have agreed to accept cuts in reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid totaling $100 billion over the next ten years, with most of the reductions coming several years from now. Another $55 billion or so will be saved from several other measures.
In return, the White House and Senate Finance Committee have agreed that a public plan option will not reimburse facilities at Medicare rates. Reportedly, the three big hospital associations agreed to the $155 billion deal after President Obama’s June announcement that his team had identified more than $200 billion in payment reductions.
The associations were also leery of the proposal to move the power to set Medicare reimbursement rates from lawmakers to a muscled-up MedPAC (Medicare Payment Advisory Commission). The current rate-setting process is controlled by Congress and subject to intense lobbying by all parties, including hospitals and sub-groups of hospitals, intent on preserving and increasing their reimbursement. An independent board modeled on the Federal Reserve would eliminate much of the industry’s influence, a situation that likely terrifies the hospitals.
As Maggie Mahar recently noted; “[MedPAC has] digested the Dartmouth research revealing that when patients in some parts of the country receive more aggressive and more expensive care, outcomes often are worse. They realize that doctors and hospitals should be rewarded for the quality of the care they provide, not the quantity.”
Yikes, that’s scary stuff. It clearly illustrates the challenge of health reform – reducing waste, which everyone agrees is rampant, means reducing revenues, in this case for hospitals. Empowering an independent commission to reduce waste would be a death sentence for many cherished hospital programs and more than a few hospitals.
The watering down of the Rockefeller bill may well be the most important piece of the deal – for both sides.
A little perspective here might help.
First, note that these savings are accruing to governmental programs.
Second, we’re talking about $15 billion in savings per year.
Third recall that hospital costs account for about a third of total expenditures, or about $700 billion per year.
I just can’t get that excited about a deal that reduces costs by two percent, especially if it eliminates/reduces our chances of saving really big dollars by not paying for lousy health care.
While the President may not be directly involved in negotiations or policy writing, he is definitely wielding the big stick. I’d respectfully suggest he use it to keep the MedPAC independence bill moving, regardless of what hospitals want.


2 thoughts on “Hospitals agree to reduce their costs – sort of”

  1. Joe–
    Back in 1996 I spent a week in Paris teaching a class on American workers’ compensation to a room full of French and Belgian insurance executives. The pay and the food were both excellent. From time to time, some of the people in my class would accuse me of exaggerating or pulling their legs. No one would be that irrational– would they?
    I get suspicious when the hospitals get religion and try making sense. Consider that we know that one major cardiovascular procedure is medically worthless, yet we still do over 100,000 of them annually, but we also know what provides optimal first hour care for stroke victims and only about 25% of hospitals follow this protocol last I heard.
    So– would a MedPAC be such a bad idea? Hospital quality varies wildly from one facility to another in this country and US hospitals kill (their own numbers) the equivalent of a 737 full of people every day through various avoidable medical accidents. This shouldn’t be just about costs. Yes, we have to get the costs in line– but what are we getting for whatever we pay is an even bigger question. Right now every hospital admissions department is just another Monte Carlo.

  2. Gary,
    I am not questioning your numbers, but could you please give a citation for the “737 full of people every day” statistic. Wikipedia says the 737 is capable of carrying 149 people and multiplying X 365 gives 54,385. On one hand that seems a lot but on the other give the scale of American Health Care, maybe not so many.
    Honestly, I’m not calling your veracity into question, it’s just that this statistic is a good one to know and to be able to support it when I am questioned would be nice.
    Best regards,
    Mike

Comments are closed.

Joe Paduda is the principal of Health Strategy Associates

SUBSCRIBE BY EMAIL

SEARCH THIS SITE

A national consulting firm specializing in managed care for workers’ compensation, group health and auto, and health care cost containment. We serve insurers, employers and health care providers.

 

DISCLAIMER

© Joe Paduda 2024. We encourage links to any material on this page. Fair use excerpts of material written by Joe Paduda may be used with attribution to Joe Paduda, Managed Care Matters.

Note: Some material on this page may be excerpted from other sources. In such cases, copyright is retained by the respective authors of those sources.

ARCHIVES

Archives