« HWR 15 is up at InsureBlog | Main | HMOs cost less because they pay less »

Part D - where next?

Part D's implications will be many, far-reaching, and complex. Why? the sheer size of the market...One-twelfth of all scripts dispensed in retail pharmacies were for Part D recipients.

Here's a snapshot of the crystal ball.

Big pharma has done well so far, very well. Helped by broad formularies, the addition of millions of people to their customer base, and myriad Part D plan sponsors, many with minimal negotiating power, pharma manufacturers have seen profits jump, driven in large part by price increases (as well as more people with drug "insurance").

Lots of people have enrolled, albeit after a careful analysis of cost-benefit, an analysis that will inevitably lead to financial problems.

There are as many as 90 different Part D plan sponsors, ranging from UnitedHealthcare to Humana to Coventry (Advantra Rx). The two largest, UHC and Humana, have 45% of the stand-alone Part D market .Expect the Coventrys to disappear from many markets over the next two years, as their lack of market share, buying power, and traction in the market forces them to either sell out or get crushed by the big players.

Sources also indicate that there are still problems with the dual-eligibles, those folks that are covered by Medicare because they're old enough and Medicaid for financial or physical reasons. The issue appears to be these dualies are enrolled in Part D as well as other plan(s), making it hard to sort out who is liable for what.

Meanwhile, Part D sponsors are not exactly rolling in profits, and probably won't be. Humana and UHC are both reporting loss ratios in the high nineties, consistent with their competition.

Comments

But the government's going to bail them out for the first couple years, right? What happens when they pull the rug out... mass exodus from the market on the part of insurers, right? You can't sustain those loss ratios for long without government help.

AARP's UHC is taking GENERIC drugs and making them Tier 3, also changing drugs from QL to Prior Authorization category without the 60 day notice to patient that the policy states they will do. AARP doesn't even respond to written requests. Sounds like they've cozied up, and the Feds don't bother overseeing. Time for SIGNIFICANT regulation.

Post a comment

Due to the growing number of spam comments, I have to ask you to do one more thing to get your comment posted. Just type in the text you see in the box below into the textbox to the right. That will prove you are a real human and not a computer system that is posting spam. Please be careful to enter in the right code; if you make a mistake the system may temporarily block you. If the authentication system is blocking you, try again in an hour. If you continue to be blocked, send your comment to jpaduda AT healthstrategyassoc DOT com and note that you would like your comment posted. Thanks.