Joseph Paduda's weblog on managed care for group health, workers compensation & auto insurance, covering health care cost containment, health policy, health research, and medical news for insurers, employers, and healthcare providers.

« Deals aplenty in work comp, and now news of one more... | Main | Why all the deals in the work comp space? »

Well, that didn't take long - the GOP 'rethinks' its commitment

UPDATE - yesterday I reported on GOP House members' commitment to cut a hundred billion from the discretionary spending this fiscal year (which, by the way, started October 1, 2010). After I posted this piece, the GOP reneged on the commitment, with aides to Speaker Boehner saying the $100 billion figure was 'hypothetical'.

No, it wasn't.

In the 'Pledge to America' the signatories said "We will roll back government spending to pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels, saving us at least $100 billion in the first year alone."

In a speech at the time of the midterm elections, Boehner himself committed to that number, saying "We're ready to cut spending to pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels, saving roughly $100 billion almost immediately." (note Boehner's website had the link up yesterday, it doesn't work today.)

So why is this in a blog focused on health care?

Simple. The GOP has committed to overturning, or at the least de-funding, health reform. Not some of the Accountable Care Act - all of it.

That includes:

- the prohibition against medical underwriting that effectively prevents those of us with pre-existing conditions from obtaining individual coverage in most states.

- the closing of the doughnut hole in Part D that will save seniors thousands on their drug bills

- the requirement (already in place) that insurers cover kids till age 26

- the requirement (already in place) that prohibits medical underwriting or pre-ex exclusion for kids

- vouchers for less-well off folks to use to help cover the cost of insurance

- prohibition on lifetime maximum coverage limits

I find it...interesting that many of the same folks who passed Part D and its $16 trillion addition to the deficit in an attempt - successful at that - to woo seniors, would now want to upset seniors, and moms, and families by killing provisions that most voters like.

We'll see.

Joseph Paduda is the principal of Health Strategy Associates.

Get notified by e-mail about site updates:

April 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Powered by
Movable Type 4.261