Apr
3

No, the Feds aren’t taking over workers comp

My last post was, in fact, MCM’s annual contribution to the national celebration of April 1. Over the last eight years I’ve had a lot of fun with this, only occasionally (once, to be precise) going just a tad too far.
Rest assured it only happens once a year – the prank, that is. Going too far may happen a bit more often.
This year’s post was purposeful – for two reasons.
Rumors about the Feds’ purported interest in getting more involved in workers comp continue to pop up every now and again, as much as we try to show how this a) makes no sense and b) there’s no one in DC with any authority remotely interested in stepping into workers comp. The April 1 post was my attempt to highlight the absurdity of the ongoing ‘debate’; there is no ‘debate’, the Federal government is not taking over workers comp.
On a broader scale, I’d ask that you, dear reader, view what you read here and everywhere else for that matter with a healthy dose of skepticism. And while you’re at it, challenge your own firmly held beliefs. None of us has sole proprietorship of the “truth”, we all can learn from each other, but only if we’re willing to listen.
We now return to our regularly scheduled blog postings…


Apr
1

Workers’ comp medical to be federalized

While all of Capitol Hill was focused on the hearings on ObamaCare at the Supreme Court, the Administration was quietly proceeding with plans to federalize the medical portion of workers’ compensation. The effort has reportedly been led by Assistant Deputy Secretary A. Pryl Pfuelle who has been working closely with the Executive Secretariat on policy implications and coordination efforts. Details on timing, rollout, reimbursement levels and other critical matters are still to be worked out, but the Secretariat is likely looking to FECA as the regulatory agency that will be tasked with oversight responsibilities.
There have been rumors about increased Federal involvement in workers comp circulating for some months, but this is the first clear indication of actual changes in the offing. Evidently the legal aspects have been addressed in the Zadroga Act and under the LibbyCare provisions of the Affordable Care Act. While these bills covered occupational disease, there is enough flexibility to allow them to extend to address occupational injury as well.
For now, this is likely to only affect the medical portion of workers comp; HHS’ Office on Disability had been involved in discussions for some time about including the disability/indemnity portion of workers comp in the program, but for now the move is “not on the table.”
While the deal isn’t “done”, reports are the planning is near complete. Evidently the move was initially brought up at a White House meeting last summer between Executive Office staff and several Fortune 500 CEOs. The execs, most of which had backed Obama’s 2008 campaign, pushed the White House to do more to help business and specifically the manufacturing and industrial sectors. Rising comp costs were specifically identified as a significant drag on hiring and a working group established to evaluate ways to reduce those costs. The group, whose members are not known, reportedly settled on utilizing the Medicare system and reimbursement mechanism as a relatively straight-forward way to reduce medical expense while also slashing work comp’s administrative costs.
At a follow up get-together early this year plans were presented to the “core group” and received a favorable response.
As most state fee schedules are based on Medicare’s RBRVS, and an increasing number of states are adopting the MS-DRG reimbursement mechanism for facility costs, the sense is this won’t be much of an issue for providers. Additional work will need to be done to refine the coding and reimbursement for comp-specific issues such as return to work planning, functionality assessment, and there will have to be some flexibility to accommodate state-specific reporting and documentation requirements.
What does this mean for you?
Time will tell.