Insight, analysis & opinion from Joe Paduda

< Back to Home

Sep
10

Part D – where next?

Part D’s implications will be many, far-reaching, and complex. Why? the sheer size of the market…One-twelfth of all scripts dispensed in retail pharmacies were for Part D recipients.
Here’s a snapshot of the crystal ball.


Big pharma has done well so far, very well. Helped by broad formularies, the addition of millions of people to their customer base, and myriad Part D plan sponsors, many with minimal negotiating power, pharma manufacturers have seen profits jump, driven in large part by price increases (as well as more people with drug “insurance”).
Lots of people have enrolled, albeit after a careful analysis of cost-benefit, an analysis that will inevitably lead to financial problems.
There are as many as 90 different Part D plan sponsors, ranging from UnitedHealthcare to Humana to Coventry (Advantra Rx). The two largest, UHC and Humana, have 45% of the stand-alone Part D market .Expect the Coventrys to disappear from many markets over the next two years, as their lack of market share, buying power, and traction in the market forces them to either sell out or get crushed by the big players.
Sources also indicate that there are still problems with the dual-eligibles, those folks that are covered by Medicare because they’re old enough and Medicaid for financial or physical reasons. The issue appears to be these dualies are enrolled in Part D as well as other plan(s), making it hard to sort out who is liable for what.
Meanwhile, Part D sponsors are not exactly rolling in profits, and probably won’t be. Humana and UHC are both reporting loss ratios in the high nineties, consistent with their competition.


2 thoughts on “Part D – where next?”

  1. But the government’s going to bail them out for the first couple years, right? What happens when they pull the rug out… mass exodus from the market on the part of insurers, right? You can’t sustain those loss ratios for long without government help.

  2. AARP’s UHC is taking GENERIC drugs and making them Tier 3, also changing drugs from QL to Prior Authorization category without the 60 day notice to patient that the policy states they will do. AARP doesn’t even respond to written requests. Sounds like they’ve cozied up, and the Feds don’t bother overseeing. Time for SIGNIFICANT regulation.

Comments are closed.

Joe Paduda is the principal of Health Strategy Associates

SUBSCRIBE BY EMAIL

SEARCH THIS SITE

A national consulting firm specializing in managed care for workers’ compensation, group health and auto, and health care cost containment. We serve insurers, employers and health care providers.

 

DISCLAIMER

© Joe Paduda 2024. We encourage links to any material on this page. Fair use excerpts of material written by Joe Paduda may be used with attribution to Joe Paduda, Managed Care Matters.

Note: Some material on this page may be excerpted from other sources. In such cases, copyright is retained by the respective authors of those sources.

ARCHIVES

Archives