Insight, analysis & opinion from Joe Paduda

< Back to Home

Aug
9

Narcotic usage – too much, or too little?

Just in case you thought the problems with abuse of powerful prescription drugs have been overstated, here’s a wake-up call.
The CDC’s Director is taking this very seriously, saying: “Overdose with prescription drugs is one of the most serious and fastest-growing problems in this country.”
The problem is showing up in a doubling of Emergency Room admissions due to prescription drug abuse, driven primarily by oxycodone, methadone, and hydrocodone.
Narcotic use is rampant in workers compensation as well. Studies by NCCI and CWCI point to the frequent use of narcotic opioids for workers comp claimants, with the explosive growth in California particularly troubling.
One of the issues in comp is that unlike group, most Medicare Part D plans, and to a lesser extent Medicaid, claimant copays are nonexistent. There’s no financial skin in the game, as medications are free.
Another potential contributor is the potential street value of these drugs; while there isn’t conclusive documentation of the percentage of scripts that are diverted, the ‘sense of the industry’ is that diversion is not uncommon. Add to that the desire on the part of some states to reduce the work comp drug fee schedule to match Medicaid, and there’s no surprise use is exploding (if PBMs can’t afford to manage utilization, utilization isn’t managed).
Here’s what some of these drugs are reportedly worth on the street.
The estimated street value of one 40-milligram OxyContin pill is about $40; another report indicates an 80mg dose is going for $30 in the northeast.
Actiq runs about $25 a dose.
Duragesic patches range from $20-$75 depending on brand, location, and dosage.
So, narcotics are ripe for abuse, there’s a big – and very profitable – secondary market for them, and use is growing. That’s one side of the story.
The other is the inability of many legitimate pain sufferers to get adequate treatment.

Research published by Oregon State University indicates “at least 30 percent of patients with moderate chronic pain and over 50 percent of those with severe chronic pain fail to achieve adequate pain relief.”
Some think the inability of those with chronic pain to get treatment thru standard channels is a big component of the overall narcotic diversion issue.
What does this mean for you?
Like so much else in health care, there are no clear problems or easy solutions. This is more evidence of the complexity of one small part of the challenge.


One thought on “Narcotic usage – too much, or too little?”

  1. Add to those issues with Part D participants, whose plans will not pay for Propoxyphene/APAP Rx’s (with good clinical reasons), but instead will pay for Vicodin & (ES) etc also making it available for their grandkids when they visit.

Comments are closed.

Joe Paduda is the principal of Health Strategy Associates

SUBSCRIBE BY EMAIL

SEARCH THIS SITE

A national consulting firm specializing in managed care for workers’ compensation, group health and auto, and health care cost containment. We serve insurers, employers and health care providers.

 

DISCLAIMER

© Joe Paduda 2024. We encourage links to any material on this page. Fair use excerpts of material written by Joe Paduda may be used with attribution to Joe Paduda, Managed Care Matters.

Note: Some material on this page may be excerpted from other sources. In such cases, copyright is retained by the respective authors of those sources.

ARCHIVES

Archives