The CBO’s 34-page analysis of Single Payer is out, and there are no references to workers’ comp or occupational injuries/illnesses.
That doesn’t mean there aren’t plenty of ways Single Payer would affect work comp.
Briefly, Single Payer is a very broad term that over-generalizes a bunch of very different approaches to universal health insurance coverage. As defined in the CBO report, in Single Payer programs “people enroll in a health plan operated by the government, and the receipts and expenditures associated with the plan appear in the government’s budget.”
When you recall that work comp accounts for about 1% of total US medical spend, it’s no wonder the CBO report ignores us. But, how Single Payer would affect comp depends on two core issues:
- whether care for occupational injuries/illnesses is covered by Single Payer, and
- whether there is a universal fee schedule.
If WC care is included under Single Payer, it is likely work comp would evolve to an indemnity-only system. This currently exists in several other countries, and seems to work pretty well.
If WC medical care is NOT included in Single Payer, the impact would be driven largely by the presence – or absence – of a universal fee schedule.
Without that universal fee schedule, providers would likely continue to do their revenue maximization thing, although they’d supercharge those efforts. Why? Because reimbursement from all other payers would drop significantly, and providers would look to comp to replace as much of that lost income as possible.
What does this mean for you?
The healthcare system is the elephant, and workers’ comp is the mouse.
One thought on “The CBO’s Single Payer Report and worker’s comp”
Would this lead to possible opening for medical travel, if providers try to squeeze more revenue without a universal fee schedule?
Comments are closed.